This school year is historic for Philippine education as the new K-to-12 curriculum rolls out in public schools. Along with this new reform which adds two years in basic education, the use of an innovative approach to learning ­­— the Mother Tongue-based Multilingual Education (MTBMLE) as a medium of instruction (MOI) for all subjects and as a subject area, has also kicked off.

The MTBMLE has long been espoused by linguists and several lawmakers for the tremendous research-backed benefits that it can bring to  learners such as minimized drop-out rates and decrease in the swelling illiteracy rate problem. Based on the 2003 Functional Literacy, Education, and Mass Media Survey (FLEMMS), 5.24 million Filipinos could not read and write while 18.37 million could not read, write, compute, and comprehend.

After generating much discourse,  authorities have finally seen the need for such a policy. The Department of Education, in July, 2009, finally shifted from the old bilingual education policy (using two second languages or L2) to the MTBMLE. And now, it is being used from Kindergarten to Grade 3.

However, staunch advocates of the policy led by University of the Philippines Department of Linguistics associate professor Dr. Ricardo Ma Duran Nolasco are not happy at all about what is happening. In fact, he is saying that the DepEd seems to be doing it the wrong way.

Good read from MB. I quite agree with Dr. Nolasco with regard to how DepEd is approaching this.

jacobimages:

Agta Man in Traditional Dress. 

The World Heritage Committee on Tuesday morning recognized the success of two countries, Pakistan and the Philippines, in improving the conservation of sites that had been inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger: Fort and Shalamar Gardens in Lahore (Pakistan) and the Rice Terraces of the Philippine Cordilleras (Philippines).

Successful measures have been taken to remove the threat to the brilliant palaces, mosques and gardens of Lahore, according to the World Heritage Committee which inscribed this outstanding testimony of Mughal civilization on the World Heritage List in 1981. Problems including urban encroachment had warranted the inscription of the site on the World Heritage List in Danger in 2000, at the request of the Pakistani government. Many of the site’s monuments have since been restored. Better drainage and planning have also improved the preservation of the site’s external walls and solved problems of dampness.

The Rice Terraces of the Philippine Cordilleras (Philippines) was inscribed on the World Heritage List in 1995 as an outstanding cultural landscape that evolved over two millennia. It was placed on the Danger List in 2001 because of threats to its essential values which required the development of better management and planning. The Philippines sought danger listing as a way to raise national and international support and cooperation in the preservation of these remote high rice fields maintained thanks to the transmission of traditional knowledge from one generation to the next.            

Also during the morning session, the Committee observed a minute of silence in memory of at least six guards reported to have been killed by Simba rebels in the Democratic Republic of Congo’s Okapi Wildlife Reserve on 24 June. The Wildlife Reserve was inscribed on UNESCO’s World Heritage List in 1996 and has been on the List in Danger since 1997.

The List of World Heritage in Danger is designed to inform the international community of threats to the outstanding universal values for which a property has been inscribed on the World Heritage List, and to encourage corrective action.